Showing posts with label digital camera review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital camera review. Show all posts

Friday, January 26, 2007

Canon IXUS 850IS digital camera Review


On its introduction last September at Photokina, the Canon IXUS 850IS followed the IXUS lineage; a very nicely made and nicely designed ultra-compact stainless steel bodied compact digital camera. Some signature features of the new camera include another million pixels over the 800IS, its predecessor and, a new, 28-105mm (35mm equiv.) optical zoom lens that provides a much more versatile focal range (for almost any subject) than that of its predecessor’s 35-140mm lens.

In terms of the lens' brightness, it has a fast F2.8 maximum aperture at 28mm end of the zoom that is joined by a very modest F5.6 maximum aperture at full zoom. However, Canon has cannily included optical image stabilisation to help in lower lighting or at longer focal lengths where you don’t want the flash to fire; it works really well having three settings: continuous, panning and shot only. As you have guessed, the first mode is on all the time, panning works well with horizontally panned snaps and the final shot mode activates when the image is made. Of the three, the latter works best for most subjects.

Enhanced (over the 800IS) sensitivities run from ISO 80 to ISO 1600, but in truth, sensitivities above ISO 400 are noisy and at ISO 800 and 1600, almost unusable. The result – unless having an image is more important than its absolute quality – is images that can only really be used at smaller print sizes.

Another problem on the 850IS is the noise reduction processing, which is much more aggressive on this camera than on previous IXUS’. The processing is via Canon’s DIGIC III processor, the latest iteration of that Canon technology, but because the small 1/2.5-inch has just over 7-megapixels crammed onto it, noise issues are actually worse on this model than other IXUS’ I’ve looked at.

The result of the noise reduction processing is loss of fine detail in all shots taken over ISO 200, elements such as fur, hair, or foliage in landscape shots for example, are smoothed over and, the result is an image that appears to contain tiny blobs of homogenized colour where once there was detail. I will look at image quality in more detail later.

In the meantime, in terms of handling, the 850IS is very nice to use. The large 2.5-inch screen is bright, has a wide angle of view and provides a very clear and clean display, though bright point sources of light made it flare badly. Menus are of the “usual” Canon type with tabbed pages of colour-coded options all scrolled using a ubiquitous four-way jog dial that is also used to scroll images in playback.

The screen can be switched off and you can adjust the level of information displayed also display, this includes a composition grid and, in playback, you can get a histogram display as well; on balance I feel this would have been better as a “live” option when shooting.

The shutter release is surrounded by a neat rocker-style lens zoom control and joined on the top plate with an attractive-looking illuminated on/off button. Despite the small size of the camera, it boasts a small optical viewfinder that is okay to use but is very slightly blurry at all focal lengths. To its right is a flip round mode dial to select manual and auto shooting modes, the Scene selection that provides access to 17-subject program modes (including aquarium modes and the usual array of night scene, portrait and landscape settings) and finally an excellent video mode that provides 640 x 480-pixel clips at 30fps with audio.

Other kit includes Face Detection AF/AE focus control that while a bit of a novelty seems to work quite well. However, the camera’s advanced Artificial intelligent Auto Focus (AiAF) system seems hit and miss, picking seemingly random elements to focus upon even when refocusing on the same scene without moving the camera or viewpoint.

Images are stored on SD/MMC external storage that slots in a port on the base of the camera alongside the Nb-5L lithium-ion battery pack. This holds enough of a charge for around 260-shots but in practice, I found it is less if the image stabilisation is set to continuous and you do a lot of work with the flash.

Metering and exposure control are very reliable although I noticed highlight detail is clipped away in hi-key shots loosing detail in image elements such as clouds and almost any highlight area in a scene. Another factor for image quality is the aforementioned image noise, which as with most cameras with an overdose of pixels on a small sensor, is far worse on the 850IS than its predecessor.

Anything over ISO 400 and the noise becomes noticeable, above 800 and it is intrusive. For small enprint size 6 x 4-inch prints this is probably not a major issue but the noise would be very apparent on larger prints and coupled with the detail smoothing from noise reduction processing discussed earlier, it will be come a real issue for prints over 5 x 7-inches.

However, the extra flexibility the wider zoom lens provides more than makes up for some other slight image quality niggles: slight softness at the edges of images (a drawback of the lenses wider 28mm wide angle design) and modest image distortion also at the wide-angle end of the zoom. Lastly, there is a slight softness to images straight out of the camera (sharpening is tad conservative by default) but easily controlled or improved to on PC in image editing software or in the camera.

Colour capture is excellent and because you have plenty of control over colour, sharpness and contrast via the excellent “Func”-tion menu system common to Canon digital compact you can really tweak the output to how you’d prefer. White balance control has the usual presets and an easy to use custom mode; the only slight chink here was in auto mode with mixed lighting indoors where things had a distinct orange cast.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Pentax's new digital camera reveiw



Introduction
I approached the review of Pentax's new little baby with some trepidation. Why, you may ask? Well, for the last 5 years I have been a Canon user through and through. I have had two of their Digital Ixus cameras (4 and 6MP - megapixel) and three of their Amateur status Digital SLRs (300D, 350D and 400D). I have also played with the Canon 10MP Ixus, and was not all that impressed, hence the reason I stuck with our 6MP Ixus.
With that in mind, I came to the Optio not expecting too much. So far, all of the 10MP compacts that I have seen or seen shots from have not been all that impressive.
The A20 is the replacement for Pentax's much liked A10, but adds some nice touches. The most obvious is the 10 Effective Mega Pixel CCD Sensor with a max capture resolution of 3648 x 2736. Other features are Shake Reduction (3 modes), Facial Recognition, a soft flash mode and most importantly the new ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) processor.

Specifications

  • 10.0 mega pixels
  • 2.5inch TFT LCD screen
  • 3x optical zoom equivalent to 38mm-114mm in 35mm format
  • 22 MB Built-in memory
  • SD & SDHC memory card compatible
  • 15cm macro
  • Sensitivity range - ISO64 - ISO800
  • Shutter speed range - 1/2000 sec. to 4 sec.

    In Use

    After charging the battery and popping my memory card into the camera (note: the A20 does not come with an SD card at all, so make sure you have a spare) I decided to perform a test in typical English overcast weather, as it should show up any issues with changeable light conditions.

    I took the camera into the countryside, and took some shots that would allow me to judge the quality of the A20's sensor and processor.

    As you can see with all the shots here, the quality of the photos is top notch - even if my skill is not. You can click any of the thumbnails for a higher resolution version.

    The camera worked well and felt good on my initial outing. The build quality is certainly up there with anything that Canon and Fuji have put together; it does not weigh much and is very slim with a great screen that is easy to see under all light conditions. I was also impressed with the speed of the auto focus when in its full auto mode; some of the other 10MP cameras struggle to do this quickly, especially when the light is low.

    On that initial outing I filled my 1Gb card, then filled the 256Mb replacement I popped in, all on the same charge. So battery life is good - I was expecting the screen to sap the battery life, so this is a welcome surprise.

    The A20 also seems to be quick when saving a shot to the card. I was timing writes on its 10MP fine mode at below 3 seconds. Considering that there is 10MPs worth of data for the ASIC to process this is good, showing that the processor is up to the job. Incidentally, the timings are around the same for my Ixus which is a lower CCD size.

    Ease of Use

    This is where the A20 really shows off. The layout of the camera and menus is very intuitive. The modes are easy to identify and use; with only a single button press to access the mode menu, switching between them is easy and quick. There are a variety of built in photo modes ranging from the default Auto mode through to completely manual modes, with things like People, Landscape, Animal, Baby and even a Food mode. In the manual mode access to speeds and ISO modes is child's play. There is even a quick switch button to put you back into the Auto mode should you need to get back to it in a hurry.

    Lens

    The lens is the same 3x zoom SMC one found on the previous compact Pentax cameras, and this is no bad thing. The reputation of the lens is a good one, and let's be honest: if it's not broke, don't fix it.

    The lens always produces sharp pictures up to its 3x magnification. However, the digital zoom mode is - like all cameras - one that should be used sparingly.

    The effective lens magnification is 38mm-114mm if compared to a 35mm camera, so gives a decent range. However it's not quite wide enough at its lowest magnification level, where as a true 35mm would have been nice.

    Technology

    Besides the obvious 10.4MP CCD (10MP effective) there is a lot of nice technology on this camera. The most obvious of which are the Shake Reduction and the Face recognition.

    The Shake Reduction system works better than the one employed on the Sony cameras of this size, and does not seem to clip the photos as much. This is probably because it uses Pentax's CCD-Shift system rather than a pure digital version. In practice I found that you could shoot at around 2 speeds quicker with the system than without. For example, a shot that I could hold sharp and steady at 1/60sec would be usable at 1/8sec with the system active. A definite advantage.

    The other system that seems to be popular with manufacturers at the moment is the facial recognition. The camera 'sees' a face and automatically adjusts both the focus point and the shooting mode as it sees fit. The Pentax system goes a little further and can actually recognise children and animals as well, and this makes the camera a great 'point and shoot' tool.

    Quality

    The A20 seems to manage happily under most conditions, although I did see it struggling on some dark scenes. However, these could be easily corrected using Photoshop without loosing any details.

    I was also shocked by how little noise this sensor created even at high ISO modes. The Ixus certainly looks better "un-shopped" but the resulting images are certainly more detailed using the A20. Even at ISO 800 the noise was not as high as I would have expected. It is worth noting that the auto mode seems to suffer most at low levels, and the best results are achieved using the Manual modes.

    As you can see, under dark light conditions the photos seem to benefit from a little Photoshoping. However the details are captured well so the photos look good after balancing.

    Verdict

    The A20 costs - at the moment - around £160 (243Eur or 315USD), so it's one of the cheapest 10MP cameras on the market.

    The quality of the shots are great, and the device is light, small and easy to use.

    This camera will certainly be added to my list of devices when I replace my now ageing Ixus.

    Yes the shots are not as good as the ones I get from my Canon 400D, however the lens on my 400D cost the same as this camera, and because of these points I can highly recommend this camera to anyone that wants a new compact digital camera.

    The only downside that I noticed, was the USB port on the device. Instead of using a standard mini USB port, Pentax have gone for an even smaller port. This means that you cannot just use a standard cable, and instead have to carry the included one around.